|
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||
| Geological Magazine |  |
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
* School of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
College of Resource and Environment Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550003, China
Department of Earth Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China
Author for correspondence: jplin{at}hotmail.com
(Received 2 August 2006; accepted 13 February 2007)
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract 1. Introduction2. Stratigraphy and localities3. Material, terminology and...4. Taphonomy of gogiid...5. Potential biological causes...6. Elemental analyses7. Stereom preservation and...8. Soft-part preservation9. Conclusions and implicationsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
Key Words: eocrinoids • stereom • taphonomy • Echinodermata • Cambrian
|
1. Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Stratigraphy and localities3. Material, terminology and...4. Taphonomy of gogiid...5. Potential biological causes...6. Elemental analyses7. Stereom preservation and...8. Soft-part preservation9. Conclusions and implicationsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
A profound change of physical and chemical sedimentary conditions in substrates occurred during the late Neoproterozoic to post-Cambrian transition, and the Cambrian interval represents a critical transitional period for substrate change (Bottjer, Hagadorn & Dornbos, 2000). Thus, the constructional morphology of Cambrian sessile echinoderms reflects the confluence of niche competition (Wilbur, 2005a,b) and substrate conditions, but the specific controls responsible for the Cambrian echinoderm diversity are subject to considerable debate. Some studies (Sprinkle & Guensburg, 1995; Wilbur, 2006) focused on the availability of skeletal substrates, whereas other studies emphasized the substrate conditions, such as the coverage of microbial mats and development of a mixed layer (Bottjer, Hagadorn & Dornbos, 2000; Dornbos & Bottjer, 2000). The present study of early and middle Cambrian stalked gogiid echinoderms is a multidisciplinary approach that provides additional information to understand better the nature of Cambrian substrates in the fine-grained siliciclastic settings.
Reports on Cambrian echinoderm faunas in China are uncommon. Putative echinoderm skeletal elements (Xue, Tang & Yu, 1992) had been reported from the Doushantuo Formation (Ediacaran), but these phosphatized microelements do not contain stereomic microstructure. Zhang & Jiang (1983) reported isolated echinoderm plates, but they misidentified them as sponge spicules. Huang, Zhao & Gong (1985) reported the first discovery of articulated gogiids in Guizhou Province, South China. However, specimens were not formally described until much later (Zhao, Huang & Gong, 1994; Zhao et al. 1999; Parsley, Zhao & Peng, 2005; Parsley & Zhao, 2006). Han et al.(2000) reported the first articulated stylophorans from the late Cambrian strata of Guangxi Province, South China. Recently, new early Cambrian gogiid faunas were discovered in Guizhou (Peng et al. 2005a,b) and Yunnan Province (Hu et al. 2006). The abundance of articulated Guizhou gogiids (n >1000) from the Balang and Kaili formations collectively provides substantial information to test hypotheses concerning the taphonomy of Cambrian erect echinoderms (e.g. Sprinkle, 1973, 1976; Dornbos & Bottjer, 2001). The substrate conditions and settlement strategy for gogiid echinoderms from the Kaili Formation are addressed in Lin, Ausich & Zhao (in press). This paper focuses on taphonomy and preservation of gogiids exemplified by Cambrian material from two faunas in Guizhou Province, South China. The objectives here are to address the following questions:
|
2. Stratigraphy and localities |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Stratigraphy and localities3. Material, terminology and...4. Taphonomy of gogiid...5. Potential biological causes...6. Elemental analyses7. Stereom preservation and...8. Soft-part preservation9. Conclusions and implicationsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
). The first reports of articulated Cambrian gogiids from South China were from the Kaili Formation, which also contains a wealth of Burgess Shale-type organisms (see Zhao et al. 2002; Lin, 2006; Lin et al. 2006). Temporal correlation of the Kaili Formation is well constrained by trilobite biostratigraphy (Yuan et al. 2002). Stratigraphy and chemostratigraphy of the Kaili Formation were thoroughly studied in Guo et al.(2005). Two gogiid species, Sinoeocrinus lui Zhao, Huang & Gong, 1994 and ‘Sinoeocrinus globus’ Zhao et al. 1999 (see Parsley, Zhao & Peng, 2005), are from the Orytocephalus indicus Zone, which is in the middle Cambrian portion of the Kaili Formation (Sundberg et al. 1999; Zhao et al. 2001). Recently, new localities in the lower Cambrian Balang Formation, which is known for its trilobite fauna (see McNamara, Feng & Zhou, 2006), has yielded an abundant gogiid fauna in association with the index trilobite Redlichia (Pteroredlichia) murakamii in eastern Guizhou (Peng et al. 2005a,b). Potentially, two new gogiid species occur in the Balang fauna, but systematic descriptions have not been completed. Balang gogiids are designated as gogiid sp. 1 and sp. 2 in this study and undoubtedly represent the richest early Cambrian gogiid fauna with the most abundant articulated specimens (Peng et al. 2005a). Both faunas contain abundant trace fossils (Yang, 1994; Yang & Zhao, 1999; Wang et al. 2004; Peng et al. 2005b; Wang et al. 2006; this study) and lack evidence for microbial mats that are characteristic of Precambrian and some Cambrian substrates (Bottjer, Hagadorn & Dornbos, 2000). In general, the benthic palaeoenvironments of the Balang and Kaili faunas consist of soft substrates composed of silt- and clay-size sediments and parautochonous skeletal debris with relatively shallow mixed layers.
|
|
3. Material, terminology and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Stratigraphy and localities3. Material, terminology and...4. Taphonomy of gogiid...5. Potential biological causes...6. Elemental analyses7. Stereom preservation and...8. Soft-part preservation9. Conclusions and implicationsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
) are abbreviated as GTBJ, and specimens from the Miaobanpo section (site 2 in Fig. 1) are abbreviated as GM. Lower Cambrian gogiids from the Balang Formation at the Wenglingtang section (site 4 in Fig. 1) are abbreviated as KW, and those from Jianggu section (site 5 in Fig. 1) are abbreviated as ZJ. In addition, some specimens of Balang gogiids are on permanent display at the Kaili No. 4 Middle School (KMS4), Kaili, Guizhou Province, China, curated by Yishan Wu. These specimens contain unparalleled information about the taphonomy of Balang gogiids; thus, they are illustrated here and assigned depository numbers.
Terminology for the major gogiid body elements is illustrated in Figure 2. Other terminology follows Sprinkle (1973). Gogiid echinoderms do not have a true ‘stem’; thus, the usage of ‘stem’ is not recommended in Ubaghs (1967a). Instead, ‘holdfast’ (see Sprinkle, 1973) is used to describe the plates below the theca. The holdfast is further divided into the stalk and attachment structure (Lin, Ausich & Zhao, in press). For ‘Sinoeocrinus globus’ (Fig. 2d, f), the stalk consists of small polygonal plates, and the attachment structure consists of tiny plates (Sprinkle, 1973, text-fig. 26) or platelets (Parsley & Prokop, 2004). The Sinoeocrinus lui (Fig. 2c, e) stalk has highly ornamented plates surrounded by tiny plates and gradually becomes an attachment structure with only platelets. The attachment structure in ‘S. globus’ is robust and disc-shaped but much less distinctive than in other species. For lower Cambrian Balang gogiids (Fig. 2a, b), holdfasts consist mainly of relatively small plates compared to thecal plates, although the attachment structure (Fig. 2a) may be similar to S. lui. The main difference between the dominant species, gogiid sp. 1 (Figs 2b, 5a–e), and the possible new species, gogiid sp. 2 (Figs 2a, 5f–j), is that gogiid sp. 2 contains a very distinct break at the junction between the theca and holdfast, whereas gogiid sp. 1 has a gradual transition from holdfast to theca. This distinction is present in both juvenile and adult specimens of the same thecal height.
|
|
, 10). Images were taken at medium resolution to avoid charging effects due to long exposure of specimens without coatings. Both secondary electron (SE) and backscatter electron (BSE) images were taken for comparison. Seven specimens (e.g. Figs 11, 12) were analysed further with an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analyser attached to the SEM to determine the chemical composition. Stereom pore size and trabecular thickness were measured on enlarged SEM printouts with a digital caliber. Source data for inferring palaeocurrent information came from the examination of 381 specimens, including museum specimens, new material collected in the field, literature (Zhao, Huang & Gong, 1994; Zhu, Erdtmann & Zhao, 1999; Parsley & Zhao, 2004), an unpublished work (J. Peng, unpub. M.S. thesis, Guizhou Univ., 2005), and a scanned booklet deposited at a permanent online address (http://hdl.handle.net/1811/24227). Data obtained for taphonomic classification are based only on new material collected near Kaili City (site 4 in Fig. 1), Guizhou Province, China.
|
|
|
|
, 7, 8, 13) have little contrast after conversion to greyscale. Thus, a non-standard colour filtering technique is adapted to enhance the morphology in greyscale. Each digital colour image was first opened with the GIMP 2.2.10 imaging software (available at: http://www.gimp.org) and the following procedure was applied. On the Filters menu, Colors option was chosen, then the Decompose function. After applying this filter effect, each colour image was converted into a stack of three greyscale layers according to the three principal colour elements RGB (red, green and blue). By scrolling down the Layer menu, individual layers could be deleted manually in order to see the greyscale layers individually. Layers could be restored by clicking the Undo function under the Edit menu. The layer with the best contrast was selected, and the new layer was saved as a JPEG or TIFF file after applying the function Flatten Image under Image menu. Each image was then imported into the drawing software CorelDraw 12 for further assembly of figures. The same procedures were applied to most of the greyscale images in this study (Figs 3, 5, 13).
|
|
|
|
|
4. Taphonomy of gogiid echinoderms |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Stratigraphy and localities3. Material, terminology and...4. Taphonomy of gogiid...5. Potential biological causes...6. Elemental analyses7. Stereom preservation and...8. Soft-part preservation9. Conclusions and implicationsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
). For example, on a single slab, the body axes can be oriented parallel to one another in the same direction (see Fig. 13), perpendicular to one another (Fig. 3b), parallel to one another but pointing in opposite directions (Fig. 3d), or in apparent clockwise rotation among neighbouring individuals (Fig. 3c). Furthermore, unlike the Laurentian gogiid faunas (Robison, 1965; Sprinkle, 1973, 1976; Durham, 1978), which contained a few specimens attaching to skeletal substrates and a general lack of attached specimens, preservation of articulated gogiids still attached to skeletal debris is common in the Guizhou material, especially for ‘S. globus’ (Lin, Ausich & Zhao, in press). This indicates a short transport history for most of the Guizhou gogiids.
Articulated specimens were buried in five basic orientations or entombment patterns (Fig. 4; see Table 1). These include: (1) gogiids laid in parallel to one another with enclosed brachioles; (2) gogiids laid in parallel to one another with brachioles splayed out in a fan-shaped pattern; (3) gogiids with body axes perpendicular to one another; (4) gogiids with body axes parallel to one another but pointing to the opposite directions; (5) gogiids with body axes oriented in a clockwise or anticlockwise rotation (which is a combination of Type 3 and Type 4 entombment patterns). This method only applies to articulated remains in this study, and the results are given in Table 2. Our study shows that the majority (92 out of 139 slabs) of Guizhou gogiid-bearing hand samples contain the Type 2 entombment pattern (Figs 2a, 4b). Slabs and hand samples containing gogiids with body axes oriented in clockwise or anticlockwise rotation among neighbouring individuals (Type 5 entombment pattern) (Figs 3c, 4e) are sometimes present in both Balang and Kaili faunas although not in every gogiid species. The presence of three or more burial orientations on the same bedding surface (or the Type 5 entombment pattern) suggests that gogiids were probably buried with high turbulent flows generated or induced by storm events.
|
|
|
). Unlike helicoplacoids (Dornbos & Bottjer, 2001), which are mostly preserved with partial disarticulation, the majority of Balang gogiids (79 %) are preserved with only a slight amount of disarticulation in both the theca and holdfast. Combined with results from entombment patterns (see Section 4.a), Balang gogiids are interpreted to have been buried rapidly in episodic obrution deposits with turbulent currents more frequently than were the helicoplacoid faunas.
|
Based on a similar body plan and no evidence for muscular articulations in gogiids, gogiids should disarticulate in a pattern similar to crinoids that lack muscles in arms, but the gogiid decay differs in several important ways. First, the brachioles were very narrow, and mesodermal connective tissue (Smith, 1990) must have played a major role in binding adjacent brachiolar plates. At least one specimen (Fig. 5i) contains articulated segments of brachioles and a disarticulated theca; thus, segments of brachioles may remain articulated on the seafloor for some period of time. Furthermore, approximately 70 % of surveyed Chinese gogiids are preserved with brachioles splayed in a fan-shaped pattern (Type 2 entombment pattern) (Fig. 5a, b, f; Table 2). Even the coiling axes of helical brachioles are preserved typically straight in transported specimens (Fig. 5c, d, i). These observations lead us to suggest that Chinese gogiid brachioles were relatively stiff in life with limited maneuverability compared to crinoid arms.
Second, the priority of theca versus holdfast decay is unclear. Specimen OSU 52615 (Fig. 5g) clearly has a mostly disarticulated theca and a mostly articulated holdfast. A single isolated attachment structure of the ‘G. globus’ type from the Kaili Formation was noted in the field. Sprinkle & Collins (2006, pl. 7, fig. 2) illustrated one specimen of Gogia stephenensis with a similar disarticulation pattern. However, two Balang specimens (KW-5–76, ZJ-15–3; unillustrated) are preserved with an articulated theca, partially disarticulated stalk plates, and missing attachment structures. Furthermore, Ubaghs & Vizcaïno (1990) illustrated a specimen of Gogia (Alanisicystis) andalusiae with attached brachioles, a partially disarticulated theca, but a fully articulated anal pyramid and holdfast. The rarity of partially disarticulated specimens, and no apparent trend of decay priority of particular body parts, lead us to reject our initial decay hypothesis. Alternatively, there is no strong decay preference among gogiid body parts. This interpretation agrees with Dornbos & Bottjer’s (2001) conclusion for helicoplacoid taphonomy.
Third, upon death of living stalked crinoids, the first decay step is the detachment of the crown (calyx plus arms) from the columnal (Oji & Amemiya, 1998), and detached crowns are relatively common in the fossil record (e.g. Gahn & Baumiller, 2004). However, this is not the case in gogiids, due to the general lack of specimens preserved as only the articulated theca and brachioles, which would be morphologically equivalent to a crinoid crown. Similarly, other closely related Cambrian eocrinoids, including Akadocrinus (Sprinkle, 1973) and Lyracystis (Sprinkle & Collins, 2006), bear a long stalk but do not disarticulate like crinoids. Therefore, the taphonomy of Cambrian stalked echinoderms collectively has an intermediate disarticulation pattern between helicoplacoids and crinoids.
Based on material for this study, gogiid literature and the literature on post-Cambrian stalked echinoderms, a general decay model for gogiids is proposed (Fig. 6). Once a gogiid was dead and laid down on the seafloor, decay of volatile tissues leading to disarticulation of body plates proceeded rapidly (Fig. 6b, c). However, ratios of isolated plates derived from brachioles, theca and holdfast that survived in a transported assemblage of gogiid remains are disproportionate because they have different masses and shapes among body plates leading to differential susceptibilities to turbulence. Therefore, unlike crinoids, from which the most commonly recognized plates are columnals, we hypothesize that for gogiids the isolated thecal plates (Fig. 6d) are the most common elements recognized in the Cambrian sediments (e.g. Sprinkle, 1973; Álvaro, Vennin & Vennin, 1997).
|
Study of disarticulation patterns gives us a sense of the articulation of the gogiid when it was alive. By comparing taphonomic studies on Cambrian (helicoplacoids: Dornbos & Bottjer, 2001) and post-Cambrian (crinoids: Ausich, 2001, and references therein) erect, sessile echinoderms, it is evident that gogiid and helicoplacoid echinoderms share a similar biological grade: no differentiation of connective tissue in binding skeletal plates. In other words, although gogiids bear a similar tripartite body plan (brachioles, theca and holdfast) to those of crinoids (arms, calyx and columnal), the holdfast in gogiids is essentially composed of immature thecal plates and represents the continuation of the main body chamber; unlike crinoid columnals that are constructed and developed distinctively different from the calyx plates.
4.c. Unusual entombment/disarticulation patterns
A dozen specimens exhibit rather unusual preservation patterns and each deserves a detailed description. All specimens except those noted in Section 4.c are from the Balang fauna, near Kaili City (site 4 in Fig. 1), Guizhou Province, South China.
4.c.1. Sunburst pattern
As described in Section 4.b, most gogiids are preserved lying on their sides. However, one Balang gogiid (Fig. 5b) and two specimens of Sinoeocrinus lui have the summit (top surface) preserved with brachioles radiating out in all directions in a sunburst orientation. The simplest explanation for the sunburst orientation in gogiids is that they were buried in situ and compressed vertically. Alternatively, individuals could be transported rapidly via storm-generated currents and positioned upside down at the burial site, analogous to some burial postures of crinoids (see starburst pattern in Gahn & Baumiller, 2004, and references therein). Where bedding information was recorded, the only preserved orientation is a sunburst gogiid compressed right side up showing the oral surface. Sunburst patterns are also known from Laurentian gogiid faunas (Sprinkle, 1973, text-figs 15, 30, pl. 21, fig. 5).
Two helicoplacoid specimens illustrated in Dornbos & Bottjer (2000, fig. 3B, C) are similar to the gogiid sunburst pattern described here, although helicoplacoids lack brachioles. Dornbos & Bottjer (2000) interpreted helicoplacoids in a mud-sticker habitat based on a few specimens (only two specimens illustrated) preserved in this position. The Balang specimens (gogiid sp. 1) reached the average adult size of helicoplacoids, but the sunburst pattern exhibited by gogiids is not explained as evidence for a mud-sticker habit. Rather, ‘S. globus’ has unambiguous evidence of attaching to skeletal debris (Fig. 3b–d), and its normal entombment patterns (Table 2) are more typical of an attached habit. Instead of being interpreted as a mud-sticker, this single Balang specimen must have been buried vertically.
4.c.2. S-shape posture
Gogiids are commonly preserved with a gently curved holdfast. This is true for those in the Balang Formation; however, a single specimen is preserved with a distinct bend in the upper portion of the holdfast stalk (Fig. 5h). Gogiids from North America have various degrees of similar curvature (Sprinkle, 1973), but not one of those specimens has the true S-shape posture illustrated here. Due to the evidence of relatively moderate bioturbation in the Balang Formation, this posture is interpreted here as the result of post-burial bioturbation (see Sections 4.c.3 and 5).
4.c.3. Selective disarticulation of body parts
Evidence of bioturbation is further supported by specimens exhibiting selective disarticulation (Fig. 5c, d, e, g, i). Specimen OSU 52613 (Fig. 5c, d) has the basal portion of brachioles and the summit of theca disarticulated, and brachioles are disoriented, pointing toward the side and posterior. Specimen OSU 52614 (Fig. 5e) exhibits both disarticulating brachioles and an obvious missing portion of the theca. Specimen OSU 52615 (Fig. 5g) contains a partially articulated theca with isolated thecal plates scattered in the matrix and is missing the upper portion of the holdfast. Finally, specimen OSU 52617 (Fig. 5i) contains a few isolated thecal plates and some articulated brachioles. These specimens collectively have evidence of decay, postmortem bio-disturbance, or a combination of both.
4.c.4. Post-mortem elongation
One slab from the Balang Formation contains two individuals with plates separated slightly one from another with signs of elongation along the longitudinal body axis (Fig. 5j). This is not an artefact of tectonic distortion because Balang gogiids are commonly preserved in different orientations on the same surface (Figs 3, 5), and there are no specimens with elongation along the latitudinal body axis. In addition, these two elongated clusters of plates cannot be mistaken for a longitudinal, cross-sectional profile of a single individual because each cluster and the spacing between clusters are approximately the same width as the maximum width of a typical gogiid holdfast in the Balang fauna. Close examination of the specimens shows that most of the theca and holdfast plates remain in relative position (holdfast plates and platelets are still partially articulated toward the base), however, these individuals are at least twice as long as the average adult theca (e.g. Fig. 5f) in the absence of brachioles. It is improbable that any traction processes at the seafloor could result in elongation of partially disarticulated plates of two individuals in parallel. Due to the absence of brachioles, these individuals probably had undergone some short period of decay prior to final burial. The cause cannot be determined with any certainty, but it must be explained by some biological or taphonomic factors.
|
5. Potential biological causes of unusual burial postures and disarticulation patterns |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Stratigraphy and localities3. Material, terminology and...4. Taphonomy of gogiid...5. Potential biological causes...6. Elemental analyses7. Stereom preservation and...8. Soft-part preservation9. Conclusions and implicationsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
are from the same locality (site 4 in Fig. 1) of the Balang Formation. In this particular locality, trace fossils occur commonly in the same horizon as gogiid faunas. The two most common trace fossils are Planolites and Rusophycus. Fodichnia (feeding traces) are dominated by Planolites, and one slab (Fig. 7a, b) contains one Planolites burrow intersecting one articulated and slightly deformed gogiid. The most probable cause for the deformation of this gogiid is the infaunal activity of the Planolites producer. After death and decay of ligaments, a loosely sutured echinoderm would be easily attacked by infaunal scavengers/predators. The gogiid specimens with selective disarticulation are missing various parts of the body, holdfast, theca or brachioles (Fig. 5c, d, e, g, i), and some of the missing sections (e.g. Fig. 5e, g) resemble portions of Planolites burrows. Whether infaunal organisms (indicated by the presence of burrows) were scavengers searching for decaying organisms or deposit feeders devouring nutrient-rich sediments in the Balang Formation is uncertain based on this study, but our field observation shows that most burrows are in close proximity to body fossils, suggesting an ecological association between infaunal organisms and decaying carcasses exemplified by gogiids. Similar post-Cambrian evidence was reported in Maples & Archer (1989). Our finding suggests that an ecological association between infaunal organisms and decaying echinoderms has occurred since the beginning of Phanerozoic times.
In addition, cubichnia (resting traces) characterized by Rusophycus (Fig. 7c) indicate epifaunal or shallow infaunal activities. Pre-burial or shallow burial bio-disturbance of carcasses could also contribute to the preservation anomalies described in Section 4.c, above. Benthic arthropods, such as redlichiid trilobites (Fig. 7d) and large bivalved arthropods (e.g. Tuzoia) (Fig. 7e), from the same deposit could have produced either enough current turbulence to enhance preferential sorting of certain ossicles or knock down erect living gogiids accidentally while moving through them. Thus, we hypothesize that a combination of in situ decay, pre-burial bio-disturbance, and post-burial bioturbation results in the diverse burial postures and selective disarticulation patterns exemplified by Balang gogiids.
|
6. Elemental analyses |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Stratigraphy and localities3. Material, terminology and...4. Taphonomy of gogiid...5. Potential biological causes...6. Elemental analyses7. Stereom preservation and...8. Soft-part preservation9. Conclusions and implicationsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
–10) under SEM, a total of 80 spot measurements in seven gogiid specimens were analysed for chemical composition and results are summarized herein (Figs 11–12). In general, the matrix of gogiid-bearing strata contains trace amounts of titanium and manganese (Fig. 11f) in association with clay minerals (e.g. illite) (Fig. 12d). The gogiid-bearing lithofacies of the Balang Formation collectively contain more mica (e.g. biotite; Fig. 12e) than those of the Kaili Formation. Important element concentrations are addressed separately.
6.a. Carbon (C)
Carbon is concentrated as inorganic and organic carbon. Inorganic carbon is stored in the carbonate molecules (calcite in this case), which can be verified if a calcium peak is also present (Figs 11a–d, 12b). Organic carbon is commonly preserved as a black region outlining the position where volatile organs and/or non-biomineralizing cuticles occurred in various taxa from the Kaili Biota (Lin, 2006). In the case of gogiid echinoderms, organic carbon (Fig. 12a) is only present in a few fresh samples from the Balang Formation (Fig. 13). Trace amounts of sulphur and iron (possibly in the form of pyrite) are indicative of the microbial decay associated with the preservation of organic carbon
6.b. Calcium (Ca)
The climate in the study region is humid with high annual precipitation (http://english.people.com.cn/data/province/guizhou.html); thus, calcium carbonate is relatively rare in weathered samples. However, the calcium peaks (Fig. 11) in fresh samples are indicative of carbonates, mainly calcite, in these siliciclastic settings. In general, there should be three sources of calcium carbonate for these fossils: (1) original calcareous gogiid plates, (2) syntaxial, magnesian and/or ferroan calcite cements (Dickson, 2001) and (3) calcium carbonates induced by microbial activities on decaying organisms (Briggs & Wilby, 1996). Calcium carbonate is concentrated mostly in either the gogiid plates with preserved stereom (Fig. 11a, c) or plates filled with syntaxial or sparry calcite cements (Ausich, 2001) (Fig. 11b, d). Some Chinese gogiid moulds contain residual amounts of calcium (Fig. 11e) compared to the surrounding matrix (Figs 11f, 12b).
6.c. Manganese (Mn)
Manganese oxides (e.g. pyrolusite) form diagnostic dendritic patterns on bedding surfaces and are commonly associated with the cracks in the rock. Spectrum analyses (Fig. 12b) show that manganese concentrations within the cavities of gogiid moulds are probably a mixture of several species of manganese oxides and hydroxides (e.g. birnessite: Post, 1999). In some cases, manganese oxides or hydroxides form pseudomorphs replacing calcite plates (indicated by the trace amount of calcium) (Fig. 12b). In addition, there are dark margins, which are also manganese-rich, around gogiids, suggesting the foreign origin of manganese concentration within the gogiid cavities.
6.d. Iron (Fe)
Iron is the most common element associated with gogiid plates and skeletal elements of other organisms in the studied region. Due to preservation of soft parts and non-biomineralizing cuticles, iron sulphide should be the dominant species of iron-bearing minerals associated with Burgess Shale-type deposits (Gabbott et al. 2004). However, iron sulphide is rarely associated with Guizhou gogiids except when organic carbon is also present. Instead, iron oxides (e.g. limonite) are formed via chemical weathering processes and give echinoderm plates a yellow to yellowish-brown colour, distinctly different from the grey, greenish grey to yellow-green matrix. Due to preservation of numerous articulated gogiids (Table 2) suggesting a rapid burial of those individuals alive or soon after death, microbial-induced pyrite should be the precursor of some of the iron oxides because in situ decay would have been unavoidable (Lin, 2006).
|
7. Stereom preservation and diagenesis of gogiids |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Stratigraphy and localities3. Material, terminology and...4. Taphonomy of gogiid...5. Potential biological causes...6. Elemental analyses7. Stereom preservation and...8. Soft-part preservation9. Conclusions and implicationsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
7.b. Stereom preservation in gogiid echinoderms
Sprinkle (1973, p. 7) and Álvaro,Vennin & Vennin (1997) reported eocrinoids preserved with calcite, and Gil Cid & Domínguez Alonso (2002, fig. 4.3, 4.6, 4.7, 4.9) first interpreted surface stereom preservation on latex casts of Ubaghsicystis segurae preserved as natural moulds, but the present study reports the first occurrence of articulated gogiids with stereomic microstructure preserved in calcite (Fig. 11). From the large collection (n >1000) of Kaili echinoderms, only two specimens representing two species are known with preserved stereom (Figs 8–10). According to Dickson (2001), there are two principal pathways for the Mg calcite transformation that occurs in echinoderm stereom. Our SEM/EDX results show that examples of Type 1 (stereom preservation) (Figs 9b, c, e, f, g–i, 10a–d, g–j), Type 2 (non-stereom preservation) (Figs 9d, 10e, i) and combined transformations (Fig. 10f) are present in articulated samples from the Kaili fauna. Dickson (2001, p. 774) hypothesized that the Mg calcite transformation can be triggered by a temperature rise during burial. Kaili samples also show evidence of thermo-alternation during diagenesis based on the presence of both stereom types containing irregular pores (Figs 9h, 10c) and trabeculae composed of secondary carbonate crystals (Fig. 10d). Due to the rarity of this exquisite preservation, only the surface stereom of thecal plates in both ‘S. globus’ and S. lui is measured and given in Table 4. Other types of stereom (see Smith, 1990) may be present on the broken surface of brachiolar and stalk plates (Figs 9b, 10g, h, j), but this needs to be confirmed with additional material. A few specimens of Balang gogiids are preserved with calcite, but preserved stereom is not known.
|
, 10d) where the pore space is largely empty (indicated by the black colour) within the three-dimensional network of trabeculae (indicated by the whitish grey colour). Furthermore, traces of labyrinthic stereom beneath the pores on the surface stereom are visible. There must be some protecting medium to preserve the stereom shape. Although syntaxial cementation is virtually unavoidable if stereom is unprotected, we suggest that the protecting medium does not always have to be carbonate cements, or ‘crystal caskets’ proposed by Dickson (2001), during Type 1 Mg calcite transformation. In order to explain the preservation of stereom shape with open pores in the Kaili deposit, the surface stereom must have been buried and partially infilled with fine mud or clays prior to the formation of syntaxial cements. This was very localized (individual plate-specific) preservation because Type 1, Type 2 and combined Mg calcite transformations occurred adjacent to one another. Alternatively, surface stereom could have been filled with syntaxial cements and then etched out during weathering. The latter case is less probable because adjacent calcite plates that underwent Type 2 transformation were virtually unaffected on the broken and crystal surfaces (Fig. 10e, f). In siliciclastic settings, echinoderms, particularly Cambrian echinoderm faunas, are preserved primarily as natural moulds (Sprinkle, 1973). Weathering byproducts preferentially stained echinoderm cavities providing good colour contrast on gogiid moulds compared to the matrix. Based on both the quality of the latex moulds that contain exceptionally fine details of plate ornamentation and rare stereom preservation, the dissolution of calcite must have taken place late during diagenesis, at least after the Cambrian successions were exposed to surface weathering in Guizhou.
|
8. Soft-part preservation |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Stratigraphy and localities3. Material, terminology and...4. Taphonomy of gogiid...5. Potential biological causes...6. Elemental analyses7. Stereom preservation and...8. Soft-part preservation9. Conclusions and implicationsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
). Close examination of both part and counterpart shows that eight out of nine individuals are well exposed and contain dark stains in the centre of theca. EDX analyses of a small portion of the slab containing two complete gogiids (Fig. 13b, c) indicate that there are high carbon concentrations (Fig. 12a) associated with these dark regions. Thus, these organic smudges are interpreted as traces of inner organs housed within the gogiid theca. Carbon films have been reported in fossil crinoids (Springer, 1901; Meyer, Milson & Webber, 1999; Meyer & Milson, 2001), but these typically occur in a discrete layer rather than a diffused stain as described in this study. |
9. Conclusions and implications |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Stratigraphy and localities3. Material, terminology and...4. Taphonomy of gogiid...5. Potential biological causes...6. Elemental analyses7. Stereom preservation and...8. Soft-part preservation9. Conclusions and implicationsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
This study shows that, regardless of the morphological differences between helicoplacoids and gogiids, these two groups belong to a similar biological grade with undifferentiated mesodermal connective tissue binding the endoskeleton. In contrast, although the basic body plans of gogiids are in some ways similar to those of crinoids, gogiid disarticulation is distinctively different from crinoid decay.
Our study confirms that the most common yellow to yellowish-brown colour associated with Cambrian echinoderm moulds is indicative of iron oxides (e.g. limonite), and the relatively less common dark brown colour is due to a concentration of manganese oxides and hydroxides (e.g. pyrolusite and birnessite: Post, 1999). Black stains in the centre of some Balang gogiids are organic carbon and are interpreted as evidence of volatile organs within gogiids. It is worth noting that although calcium carbonate is rare in both deposits, it is preserved with various colours. One specimen (Fig. 8a) contains plates with light yellow stereom in contrast to ossicles with white calcite. The other analysed specimen (Fig. 8b) contains both dark grey stereom and calcite plates. The latter colour may reflect the impurities (trace amounts of manganese and iron) incorporated into the calcite structure during decay of both volatile organs in the body cavity and mesodermal connective tissue within the ossicle.
Although surface stereom preservation in Early Palaeozoic carpoid faunas is common in shale facies (Smith, 1990), stereomic preservation in similar facies is rarely reported from Cambrian strata. The preservation of stereomic microstructure from Guizhou Province, South China is one of the oldest reported examples of stereom on articulated gogiid echinoderms. The timing of dissolution of Cambrian echinoderm stereom is fairly recent. This raises the possibility that more well-preserved gogiids with stereom should be preserved in South China and Laurentia (e.g. Spence Shale: Sprinkle, 1973, 1976; Gunther & Gunther, 1981).
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Stratigraphy and localities3. Material, terminology and...4. Taphonomy of gogiid...5. Potential biological causes...6. Elemental analyses7. Stereom preservation and...8. Soft-part preservation9. Conclusions and implicationsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Stratigraphy and localities3. Material, terminology and...4. Taphonomy of gogiid...5. Potential biological causes...6. Elemental analyses7. Stereom preservation and...8. Soft-part preservation9. Conclusions and implicationsAcknowledgementsReferences |
|---|
ÁLVARO, J. J., VENNIN, Z. & VENNIN, E. 1997. Episodic development of Cambrian eocrinoid-sponge meadows in the Iberian Chains (NE Spain). Facies 37, 49–63.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
AUSICH, W. I. 1977. The functional morphology and evolution of Pisocrinus (Crinoidea: Silurian). Journal of Paleontology 51, 672–86.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]
AUSICH, W. I. 1983. Functional morphology and feeding dynamics of the Early Mississippian crinoid Barycrinus asteriscus. Journal of Paleontology 57, 31–41.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]
AUSICH, W. I. 1977. The functional morphology and evolution of Pisocrinus (Crinoidea: Silurian). Journal of Paleontology 51, 672–86.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]
AUSICH, W. I. 1983. Functional morphology and feeding dynamics of the Early Mississippian crinoid Barycrinus asteriscus. Journal of Paleontology 57, 31–41.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]
AUSICH, W. I. 2001. Echinoderm taphonomy. In Echinoderm Studies – Volume 6 (eds M. Jangoux & J. M. Lawrence), pp. 171–227. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.
AUSICH, W. I. & BABCOCK, L. E. 2000. Echmatocrinus, a Burgess Shale animal reconsidered. Lethaia 33, 92–4.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
AUSICH, W. I. & BAUMILLER, T. K. 1993. Taphonomic method for determining muscular articulations in fossil crinoids. Palaios 8, 477–84.
AUSICH, W. I. & BAUMILLER, T. K. 1998. Disarticulation patterns in Ordovician crinoids: Implications for the evolutionary history of connective tissue in the Crinoidea. Lethaia 13, 113–23.
BAUMILLER, T. K. & AUSICH, W. I. 1992. The ‘Broken Stick’ model as a null hypothesis for crinoid stalk taphonomy and as a guide to the distribution of connective tissue in fossil crinoids. Paleobiology 18, 288–98.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]
BERG-MADSEN, V. 1986. Middle Cambrian cystoid (sensu lato) stem columnals from Bornholm, Denmark. Lethaia 19, 67–80.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
BOTTJER, D. J., HAGADORN, J. W. & DORNBOS, S. Q. 2000. The Cambrian substrate revolution. GSA Today 10, no. 9, 1–7.[GeoRef]
BRIGGS, D. E. G. & WILBY, P. R. 1996. The role of the calcium carbonate–calcium phosphate switch in the mineralization of soft-bodied fossils. Journal of the Geological Society, London 153, 665–8.
CLAUSEN, S. & SMITH, A. B. 2005. Palaeoanatomy and biological affinities of a Cambrian deuterostome (Stylophora). Nature 438, 351–4.[CrossRef][Medline][GeoRef]
DICKSON, J. A. D. 2001. Diagenesis and crystal caskets: Echinoderm Mg calcite transformation, Dry Canyon, New Mexico, U.S.A. Journal of Sedimentary Research 71, 764–77.
DONOVAN, S. K. 1991. The taphonomy of echinoderms: Calcareous multi-element skeletons in the marine environment. In The Process of Fossilization (ed. S. K. Donovan), pp. 241–69. London: Belhaven Press.
DORNBOS, S. Q. & BOTTJER, D. J. 2000. Evolutionary paleoecology of the earliest echinoderms: helicoplacoids and the Cambrian substrate revolution. Geology 28, 839–42.
DORNBOS, S. Q. & BOTTJER, D. J. 2001. Taphonomy and environmental distribution of helicoplacoid echinoderms. Palaios 16, 197–204.
DURHAM, J. W. 1978. A Lower Cambrian eocrinoid. Journal of Paleontology 52, 195–9.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]
GABBOTT, S. E., HOU, X.-G., NORRY, M. J. & SIVETER, D. J. 2004. Preservation of Early Cambrian animals of the Chengjiang biota. Geology 32, 901–4.
GAHN, F. J. & BAUMILLER, T. K. 2004. A bootstrap analysis for comparative taphonomy applied to Early Mississippian (Kinderhookian) crinoids from the Wassonville Cycle of Iowa. Palaios 19, 17–38.
GAINES, R. R., KENNEDY, M. J. & DROSER, M. L. 2005. A new hypothesis for organic preservation of Burgess Shale taxa in the middle Cambrian Wheeler Formation, House Range, Utah. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 220, 193–205.[CrossRef][GeoRef]
GIL CID, M. D. & DOMINGUEZ ALONSO, P. 1999. Diversity of Lower–Middle Cambrian echinoderms and carpoids from Spain. Coloquios de Paleontología 50, 107–18.
GIL CID, M. D. & DOMINGUEZ ALONSO, P. 2002. Ubaghsicystis segurae nov. gen. and sp., a new Eocrinoid (Echinodermata) of Middle Cambrian from northern Spain. Coloquios de Paleontología 53, 21–32.
GLASS, A. 2006. Pyritized tube feet in a protasterid ophiuroid from the Upper Ordovician of Kentucky, U.S.A. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 51, 171–84.
GUENSBURG, T. E. & SPRINKLE, J. 1992. Rise of echinoderms in the Paleozoic evolutionary fauna: Significance of paleoenvironmental controls. Geology 20, 407–10.
GUNTHER, L. F. & GUNTHER, V. G. 1981. Some Middle Cambrian fossils of Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies 28, 1–81.
GUO, Q.-J., STRAUSS, H., LIU, C.-Q., ZHAO, Y.-L., PI, D.-H., FU, P.-Q., ZHU, L.-J. & YANG, R.-D. 2005. Carbon and oxygen isotopic composition of Lower to Middle Cambrian sediments at Taijiang, Guizhou Province, China. Geological Magazine 142, 723–33.
HAN, N.-R., TANG, L., WEI, R.-S. & WANG, G.-B. 2000. Stratigraphy of Upper Cambrian from Guole, Jingxi, Guangxi. Journal of Guilin Institute of Technology 20, 350–5 (in Chinese with English abstract).[GeoRef]
HU, S.-X., LUO, H.-L., HOU, S.-G. & ERDTMANN, B.-D. 2006. Eocrinoid echinoderms from the Lower Cambrian Guanshan Fauna in Wuding, Yunnan, China. Chinese Science Bulletin 51, 1366–8 (in Chinese).
HUANG, Y.-Z., ZHAO, Y.-L. & GONG, X.-Y. 1985. Discovery of Echinodermata from Middle Cambrian Kaili Formation in Taijiang of Guizhou. Journal of Guizhou Institute of Technology 14, no. 4, 123 (in Chinese with translated title).
LANE, N. G. & SEVASTOPULO, G. D. 1981. Functional morphology of a microcrinoid: Kallimorphocrinus punctatus n. sp. Journal of Paleontology 55, 13–28.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]
LANE, N. G. & SEVASTOPULO, G. D. 1982. Microcrinoids from the middle Pennsylvanian of Indiana. Journal of Paleontology 56, 103–15.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]
LAPHAM, K. E., AUSICH, W. I. & LANE, N. G. 1976. A technique for developing the stereom of fossil crinoid ossicles. Journal of Paleontology 50, 245–8.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]
LIN, J.-P. 2006. Taphonomy of naraoiids (Arthropoda) from the Middle Cambrian Kaili Biota, Guizhou Province, South China. Palaios 21, 15–25.
LIN, J.-P., AUSICH, W. I. & ZHAO, Y.-L. In press. Settling strategy of eocrinoids from the Kaili Biota (middle Cambrian), Guizhou Province, South China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology.
LIN, J.-P., GON, S. M. III, GEHLING, J. G., ZHAO, Y.-L., ZHANG, X.-L., HU, S.-X., YUAN, J.-L., Yu, M.-Y. & PENG, J. 2006. A Parvancorina-like arthropod from Cambrian strata of South China. Historical Biology 18, 33–45.
LIN, J.-P., YUAN, J.-L., WANG, Y. & ZHAO, Y.-L. 2005. Introduction to the type section of the Kaili Formation, Danzhai, Guizhou Province, China. In Cambrian System of China and Korea – Guide to Field Excursions (eds S.-C. Peng, L. E. Babcock & M.-Y. Zhu), pp. 55–61. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press.
MACURDA, D. B. JR & MEYER, D. L. 1975. The microstructure of the crinoid endoskeleton. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Paper 74, 1–22, 30 pls.
MAPLES, C. G. & ARCHER, A. W. 1989. Paleoecological and sedimentological significance of bioturbated crinoid calyces. Palaios 4, 379–83.
MCNAMARA, K. J., FENG, Y. & ZHOU, Z.-Y. 2006. Ontogeny and heterochrony in the Early Cambrian oryctocephalid trilobites Changaspis, Duyunaspis and Balangia from China. Palaeontology 49, 1–19.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]
MEYER, D. L. & MILSON, C. V. 2001. Microbial sealing in the biostratinomy of Uintacrinus Lagerstätten in the Upper Cretaceous of Kansas and Colorado, USA. Palaios 16, 535–46.
MEYER, D. L., MILSON, C. V. & WEBBER, A. J. 1999. Uintacrinus: A riddle wrapped in an enigma. Geotime 44, no. 8, 14–16.
OJI, T. & AMEMIYA, S. 1998. Survival of crinoid stalk fragments and its taphonomic implications. Paleontological Research 2, 67–70.[GeoRef]
PARSLEY, R. L. & PROKOP, R. J. 2004. Functional morphology and paleoecology of some sessile Middle Cambrian echinoderms from the Barrandian region of Bohemia. Czech Geological Survey Bulletin of Geosciences 79, 147–56.
PARSLEY, R. L. & ZHAO, Y.-L. 2004. Functional morphology of brachioles in gogiid and other Early and Middle Cambrian eocrinoids. In Echinoderms: München (eds T. Heinzeller & J. H. Nebelsick), pp. 479–84. Leiden: A. A. Balkema.
PARSLEY, R. L. & ZHAO, Y.-L. 2006. Long stalked eocrinoids in the basal Middle Cambrian Kaili Biota, Taijiang County, Guizhou Province, China. Journal of Paleontology 80, 1058–71.
PARSLEY, R. L., ZHAO, Y.-L. & PENG, J. 2005. Systematics, ontogeny, and functional morphology of gogiid eocrinoids in the Kaili Biota: (Middle Cambrian; Echinodermata). Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 22(Supp.), 141–2.
PENG, J., ZHAO, Y.-L., WU, Y.-S., YUAN, J.-L. & TAI, T.-S. 2005a. The Balang Fauna – a new early Cambrian fauna from Kaili City, Guizhou Province. Chinese Science Bulletin 50, 1–4.
PENG, J., ZHAO, Y.-L., YUAN, J.-L., WANG, Y. & WU, Y.-S. 2005b. The Early Cambrian Balang Fauna from Kaili City, South China. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, 22(Supp.), 147.
POST, J. E. 1999. Manganese oxide minerals: Crystal structures and economic and environmental significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 3447–54.
ROBISON, R. A. 1965. Middle Cambrian eocrinoids from western North America. Journal of Paleontology 39, 355–64.[Abstract][GeoRef]
RIDDLE, S. W., WULFF, J. I. & AUSICH, W. I. 1988. Biomechanics and stereomic microstructure of the Gilbertsocrinus tuberosus column. In Echinoderm Biology – Proceedings of the Sixth International Echinoderm Conference Victoria/23–28 August 1987 (eds R. D. Burke, P. V. Mladenov, P. Lambert & R. L. Parsley), pp. 641–8. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.
ROUX, M. 1975. Microstructural analysis of the crinoid stem. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Paper 75, 1–7, 2 pls.
SEVASTOPULO, G. D. & KEEGAN, J. B. 1980. A technique for revealing the stereom microstructure of fossil crinoids. Palaeontology 23, 749–56.[GeoRef]
SKINNER, E. S. 2005. Taphonomy of exceptionally preserved fossils from the Kinzers Formation (Cambrian), southeastern Pennsylvania. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 220, 167–92.[CrossRef][GeoRef]
SKOVSTED, C. B. 2006. Small shelly fossils from the basal Emigrant Formation (Cambrian, uppermost Dyeran Stage) of Split Mountain, Nevada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 43, 487–96.[GeoRef]
SMITH, A. B. 1982. The affinities of the Middle Cambrian Haplozoa (Echinodermata). Alcheringa 6, 93–9.[Web of Science][GeoRef]
SMITH, A. B. 1990. Biomineralization in echinoderms. In Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes, and Evolutionary Trends (ed. J. G. Carter), pp. 413–43, pls 170–5. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
SOHN, I. G. 1956. The transformation of opaque calcium carbonate to translucent calcium fluoride in fossil Ostracoda. Journal of Paleontology 30, 113–14.[Web of Science][GeoRef]
SPRINGER, F. 1901. Uintacrinus, its structure and relations. Harvard College Museum of Comparative Zoology Memoir 25, 1–89.
SPRINKLE, J. 1973. Morphology and Evolution of Blastozoan Echinoderms. Cambridge: The Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 284 pp.
SPRINKLE, J. 1976. Biostratigraphy and paleoecology of Cambrian echinoderms from the Rocky Mountains. Brigham Young University Geology Studies 23(2), 61–73.
SPRINKLE, J. & COLLINS, D. 2006. New eocrinoids from the Burgess Shale, southern British Columbia, Canada, and the Spence Shale, northern Utah, USA. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 43, 303–22.[GeoRef]
SPRINKLE, J. & GUENSBURG, T. E. 1995. Origin of echinoderms in the Paleozoic Evolutionary Fauna: The role of substrates. Palaios 10, 437–53.
SPRINKLE, J. & GUTSCHICK, R. C. 1967. Costatoblastus, a channel fill blastoid from the Sappington Formation of Montana. Journal of Paleontology 41, 385–402.[Abstract][GeoRef]
SUNDBERG, F. A., YUAN, J.-L., MCCOLLUM, L. B. & ZHAO, Y.-L. 1999. Correlation of the Lower–Middle Cambrian boundary of South China and western United States of America. Acta Palaeontolgica Sinica 38(Supp.), 102–7.
UBAGHS, G. 1967a. Eocrinoidea. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part S, Echinodermata 1, vol. 2 (ed. R. C. Moore), pp. 455–95. Boulder and Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas.
UBAGHS, G. 1967b. Cymbionites and Peridionites – unclassified Middle Cambrian echinoderms. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part S, Echinodermata 1, vol. 2 (ed. R. C. Moore), pp. 634–7. Boulder and Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas.
UBAGHS, G. & ROBISON, R. A. 1985. A new homoiostelean and a new eocrinoid from the Middle Cambrian of Utah. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 115, 1–24.
UBAGHS, G. & VIZCAINO, D. 1990. A new eocrinoid from the Lower Cambrian of Spain. Palaeontology 33, 249–56.[Web of Science][GeoRef]
WALCOTT, C. D. 1917. Cambrian geology and paleontology IV. Fauna of the Mount Whyte Formation. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection 67, 61–114, pls 8–13.
WANG, Y., ZHAO, Y.-L., LIN, J.-P. & WANG, P.-L. 2004. Relationship between trace fossil Gordia and medusiform fossils Pararotadiscus from the Kaili Biota, Taijiang, Guizhou, and its significance. Geological Review 50, 113–19, 2 pls (in Chinese with English abstract).
WANG, Y., ZHOU, Z.-C., ZHAO, Y.-L. & YU, M.-Y. 2006. Relationship between ichnocoenosis and sedimentary environment in the Lower–Middle Cambrian Kaili Formation of Taijiang, Guizhou, China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 45, 243–51.[GeoRef]
WHITEHOUSE, F. W. 1941. The Cambrian Faunas of northeastern Australia. Part 4: Early Cambrian echinoderms similar to the larval stages of recent forms. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 12, 1–28, 4 pls.
WILBUR, B. C. 2005a. E Pluribus Duo: Nine helicoplacoid species reduced to two. Acta Microplaeontologica Sinica 22 (Supp.), 198–9.
WILBUR, B. C. 2005b. Paleontological topiary: The North American Early Cambrian echinoderm tree and implications for competitive exclusion during the "Cambrian explosion." Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 37, no. 7, 306.
WILBUR, B. C. 2006. Reduction in the number of Early Cambrian helicoplacoid species. Palaeoworld 15, 283–93.[CrossRef]
XUE, Y.-S., TANG, T.-F. & YU, C.-L. 1992. Discovery of oldest skeletal fossils from Upper Sinian Doushantuo Formation in Weng’An, Guizhou, and its significance. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 31, 530–9, 2 pls (in Chinese with English abstract).[GeoRef]
YANG, R.-D. & ZHAO, Y.-L. 1999. Discovery on trace fossils from the Early–Middle Cambrian Kaili Formation of Taijiang, Guizhou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 38(Supp.), 58–65 (in Chinese with English abstract).
YANG, S.-P. 1994. Trace fossils from Early–Middle Cambrian Kaili Formation in Taijiang, Guizhou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 33, 350–8 (in Chinese with English abstract).
YUAN, J.-L., ZHAO, Y.-L., LI, Y. & HUANG, Y.-Z. 2002. Trilobite Fauna of the Kaili Formation (Uppermost Lower Cambrian – Lower Middle Cambrian) from Southeastern Guizhou, South China. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 423 pp. (in Chinese with English abstract).
ZHANG, S.-P. & JIANG, N. 1983. Sponge spicules from the Tsinghsutung Formation (Lower Cambrian), Yutang, Huayuan County. Hunan Geology 2, 64–9, 1 pl. (in Chinese).
ZHAO, Y.-L., HUANG, Y.-Z. & GONG, X.-Y. 1994. Echinoderm fossils of Kaili Fauna from Taijiang, Guizhou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 33, 305–24 (in Chinese with English abstract).
ZHAO, Y.-L., YUAN, J.-L., MCCOLLUM, L. B., SUNDBERG, F. A., YANG, R.-D., GUO, Q.-J., ZHU, L.-J. & YANG, X.-L. 2001. A potential GSSP for the Lower and Middle Cambrian boundary near Balang village, Taijiang county, Guizhou Province, China. Acta Palaeontological Sinica 40, 130–42.
ZHAO, Y.-L., YANG, R.-D., ZHU, M.-Y., YUAN, J.-L. & PENG, J. 2002. Middle Cambrian Kaili Biota. In Guizhou –Palaeontological Kingdom (ed. Y.-L. Zhao), pp. 110–59. Guiyang: Guizhou Science and Technology Press (in Chinese).
ZHAO, Y.-L., YUAN, J.-L., ZHU, M.-Y., YANG, R.-D., GUO, Q.-J., QIAN, Y., HUANG, Y.-Z. & PAN, Y. 1999. A progress report on research on the early Middle Cambrian Kaili Biota, Guizhou, PRC. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 38 (Supp.), 1–14 (in Chinese with English abstract).[GeoRef]
ZHU, M.-Y., ERDTMANN, B.-D. & ZHAO, Y.-L. 1999. Taphonomy and paleoecology of the early Middle Cambrian Kaili Lagerstätte in Guizhou, China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 38(Supp.), 28–57 (in Chinese with English abstract).
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
