Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Geological Magazine   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geological Magazine; November 2007; v. 144; no. 6; p. 1031-1032; DOI: 10.1017/S0016756807003627
© 2007 Cambridge University Press (CUP)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Review

CATUNEANU, O. 2006. Principles of Sequence Stratigraphy.

ix + 375 pp. Amsterdam, Boston, Heidelberg: Elsevier. Price Euro 80.00, £55.00, US $86.95 (hard covers). ISBN 0 444 51568 2.

Trevor Elliott

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

After a contentious and often turbulent start, sequence stratigraphy is now widely accepted as an additional tool in the kit of sedimentary geologists striving to interpret the record of sediments and sedimentary rocks. Elements of what we now understand as sequence stratigraphy had been rumbling along in the background for some time before the explosion that started to appear in the scientific literature in the late 1970s. It is easy, with the benefit of hindsight, to find key elements of the concepts in papers published during the 1950s and 1960s but we had to wait until the 1970s for these elements to be organized into a coherent framework. That this phase took place largely within the confines of a commercial company (Exxon) using seismic and related data that were far from being in the public domain imparts a very distinctive character to the development of the concepts. Much of the early criticism of sequence stratigraphy relates to this point. Some also erroneously saw sequence stratigraphy as an attempt to replace existing, established approaches. In fact it is a complement to these approaches and by reviving the importance of time in relation to . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Cambridge University Press (CUP)