Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Geological Magazine   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geological Magazine; May 2008; v. 145; no. 3; p. 435-440; DOI: 10.1017/S0016756808004883
© 2008 Cambridge University Press (CUP)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WOODCOCK, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by MORT, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Classification of fault breccias and related fault rocks

N. H. WOODCOCK* and K. MORT

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK

* Author for correspondence: nhw1{at}esc.cam.ac.uk

Despite extensive research on fault rocks, and on their commercial importance, there is no non-genetic classification of fault breccias that can easily be applied in the field. The present criterion for recognizing fault breccia as having no ‘primary cohesion’ is often difficult to assess. Instead we propose that fault breccia should be defined, as with sedimentary breccia, primarily by grain size: with at least 30 % of its volume comprising clasts at least 2 mm in diameter. To subdivide fault breccias, we advocate the use of textural terms borrowed from the cave-collapse literature –crackle, mosaic and chaotic breccia – with bounds at 75 % and 60 % clast content. A secondary breccia discriminant, more difficult to apply in the field, is the ratio of cement to matrix between the clasts. Clast-size issues concerning fault gouge, cataclasite and mylonite are also discussed.

Key Words: breccia • gouge • cataclasite




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
N.H. WOODCOCK, N.J. SAYERS, and J.A.D. DICKSON
Fluid flow history from damage zone cements near the Dent and Rawthey faults, NW England
Journal of the Geological Society, July 1, 2008; 165(4): 829 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Cambridge University Press (CUP)