Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
  Geological Magazine   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Geological Magazine; March 2008; v. 145; no. 2; p. 215-233; DOI: 10.1017/S0016756807004025
© 2008 Cambridge University Press (CUP)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WANG, X.-L.
Right arrow Articles by SHI, Y.-R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geochronology and geochemistry of Neoproterozoic mafic rocks from western Hunan, South China: implications for petrogenesis and post-orogenic extension

XIAO-LEI WANG*, JIN-CHENG ZHOU*,{dagger}, JIAN-SHENG QIU*, SHAO-YONG JIANG* and YU-RUO SHI{ddagger}

* State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, Department of Earth Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, PR China
{ddagger} Beijing SHRIMP Center, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100026, PR China

{dagger} Author for correspondence: j.c.zhou{at}public1.ptt.js.cn

The Neoproterozoic mafic rocks in western Hunan, South China, form a NNE-striking mafic rock belt for which outcrops are found predominantly in Guzhang, Qianyang and Tongdao. Samples from Qianyang and Tongdao yielded ion microprobe U–Pb zircon ages of 747 ± 18 Ma and 772 ± 11 Ma, respectively. The mafic rocks are geochemically divided into two subtypes. Ultramafic rocks from Tongdao are depleted in Nb and Ti, with decoupled Nd–Hf isotopes, and geochemical features similar to the c. 761 Ma mafic–ultramafic rocks from Longsheng, northern Guangxi. Their {varepsilon}Nd(t) value is –2.91, implying an enriched mantle source. Alkaline mafic rocks from Qianyang and Guzhang have high values of TiO2, total alkali, some high field strength elements and (La/Yb)N, and low Zr/Nb, La/Nb, Sm/Nd and 143Nd/144Nd ratios as well as coupled Nd–Hf isotopes. They are geochemically similar to ocean island basalts and show fractional crystallization of Fe–Ti oxides, olivine and pyroxene in the mafic magma. The c. 760 Ma mafic rocks in western Hunan may be the products of post-orogenic magmatism. After the Jinningian (Sibao) orogenic process, the upwelling of the deep asthenospheric mantle caused by the break-off and detachment of the subducted oceanic slab led to extension in the area. The extension might have taken place earlier in the Tongdao and Longsheng areas, which led to the partial melting of the lithospheric mantle that had been metasomatized during early oceanic subduction to generate a relatively large amount of sub-alkaline rocks. However, the less alkaline mafic rocks in Qianyang and Guzhang might have been generated in the relatively later stage of the extension, and may have resulted from a small degree of partial melting of the asthenospheric mantle.

Key Words: mafic rocks • petrogenesis • post-orogenic extension • Neoproterozoic • South China






JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Cambridge University Press (CUP)