Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Geological Magazine   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geological Magazine; January 2007; v. 144; no. 1; p. 191-210; DOI: 10.1017/S0016756806002664
© 2007 Cambridge University Press (CUP)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BOZKURT, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Extensional v. contractional origin for the southern Menderes shear zone, SW Turkey: tectonic and metamorphic implications

ERDIN BOZKURT*

Middle East Technical University, Department of Geological Engineering, Tectonic Research Unit, TR–06531 Ankara, Turkey

* E-mail: erdin{at}metu.edu.tr

The southern Menderes Massif in southwest Turkey consists mainly of orthogneisses and overlying Palaeozoic–Middle Paleocene schists and marbles. The contact between the two distinct rock types is almost everywhere structural, herein named the southern Menderes shear zone: a S-facing, high-angle ductile shear zone that separates metamorphic rocks of differing grade. Although there is a consensus that the shear zone was associated with top-to-the-S–SSW shearing and is of Tertiary age, its origin and nature have been highly debated over the last decade. Some claim the contact is a thrust fault, while others have argued for an extensional shear zone. Integration of field and microstructural data (the identification of different fabrics, associated kinematics and overprinting relationships) with fission-track thermochronology and the P–T paths of the rocks above and below the shear zone, supports the conclusion that the southern Menderes shear zone is an extensional shear zone and not a thrust. The data are consistent with a model that the exhumation and cooling of the southern Menderes Massif occurred after a period of extensional deformation. Pervasive top-to-the-N–NNE high-temperature–medium-pressure ductile shear structures (D2 deformation) overprint an early HP event (D1 deformation). The subsequent top-to-the-S–SSW greenschist shear band foliation (D3 deformation) developed mostly around the orthogniess–schist contact and forms the most characteristic features of the massif. The top-to-the-N–NNE structures are attributed to the main Alpine constructional deformation that developed during back-thrusting of the Lycian nappes during the latest Palaeogene collision between the Sakarya continent and the Anatolide-Tauride platform across the Neotethyan Ocean. The top-to-the-S–SSW structures are interpreted to be the result of the exhumation of the massif during the activity of the southern Menderes shear zone. The presence of these two distinct fabrics with differing kinematics suggests that the southern Menderes shear zone operated as a top-to-the-N–NNE thrust fault during early Alpine contractional deformation but was later reactivated with an opposite sense of movement (top-to-the-S–SSW) during subsequent Oligocene–Miocene extensional collapse.

Key Words: shear zone • extension • contraction • Menderes Massif • SW Turkey




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
Y. Dilek and S. Altunkaynak
Geochemical and temporal evolution of Cenozoic magmatism in western Turkey: mantle response to collision, slab break-off, and lithospheric tearing in an orogenic belt
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 311(1): 213 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
D. J. J. van Hinsbergen and F. Boekhout
Neogene brittle detachment faulting on Kos (E Greece): implications for a southern break-away fault of the Menderes metamorphic core complex (western Turkey)
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 311(1): 311 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
T. Taymaz, Y. Yilmaz, and Y. Dilek
The geodynamics of the Aegean and Anatolia: introduction
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 291(1): 1 - 16.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Cambridge University Press (CUP)