Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Geological Magazine

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O’LEARY, N. Articles by MACDONALD, D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Evolution of the Timan–Pechora and South Barents Sea basins

Bullard Laboratories, Department of Earth Sciences, Madingley Rise, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, UK

^* Author for correspondence: nwhite{at}esc.cam.ac.uk

We have analysed 129 stratigraphic sections from the Timan–Pechora basin, from its adjacent continental shelf and from the South Barents Sea basin, in order to determine whether existing models of extensional sedimentary basin formation can be applied to these intracratonic basins or whether new mechanisms of formation need to be invoked. The subsidence history of each section has been calculated using standard backstripping techniques. An inverse model, based on finite-duration lithospheric stretching, has then been used to calculate the distribution of strain rate as a function of time required to fit each subsidence profile. Results demonstrate an excellent fit between theory and observation. By combining our analysis with independent field-based and geophysical observations, we show that the Timan–Pechora basin underwent at least four phases of mild lithospheric stretching during the Phanerozoic (ß < 1.2). These phases occurred in Ordovician, Late Ordovician–Silurian, Middle–Late Devonian and Permian–Early Triassic times. Growth on normal faults, episodes of volcanic activity and regional considerations provide corroborative support for the existence of all four phases. Although less well constrained, subsidence data from the South Barents Sea basin are consistent with a similar Early–Middle Palaeozoic history. The main difference is that Permian–Early Triassic extension is substantially greater than that seen onshore. This similarity implies structural connectivity throughout their respective evolutions. Finally, subsidence modelling demonstrates that rapid foreland basin formation, associated with the Uralian Orogeny, was initiated in Permo-Triassic times and is confined to the eastern margin of the Timan–Pechora basin. Coeval foreland subsidence does not occur on the eastern margin of the South Barents Sea basin, supporting the allochthonous nature of Novaya Zemlya. The most puzzling result is the existence of simultaneous lithospheric extension and foreland loading in Permian–Early Triassic times. This juxtaposition is most clearly seen within the Timan–Pechora basin itself and suggests that convective drawdown may play a role in foreland basin formation.

Key Words: sedimentary basins • extension • Timan–Pechora • strain rate • lithosphere

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. A. Stephenson, T. Yegorova, M.-F. Brunet, S. Stovba, M. Wilson, V. Starostenko, A. Saintot, and N. Kusznir Late Palaeozoic intra- and pericratonic basins on the East European Craton and its margins Geological Society, London, Memoirs, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 463 - 479. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Kostyuchenko, R. Sapozhnikov, A. Egorkin, D. G. Gee, R. Berzin, and L. Solodilov Crustal structure and tectonic model of northeastern Baltica, based on deep seismic and potential field data Geological Society, London, Memoirs, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 521 - 539. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. G. Gee and V. Pease The Neoproterozoic Timanide Orogen of eastern Baltica: introduction Geological Society, London, Memoirs, January 1, 2004; 30(1): 1 - 3. [Abstract] [PDF]