Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Geological Magazine

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by WILLIAMS, M. Articles by TAYLOR, P. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Upper Ordovician ostracods from the Cautley district, northern England: Baltic and Laurentian affinities

MARK WILLIAMS^*,, PHILIP STONE, DAVID J. SIVETER and PAULINE TAYLOR^*

^* British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LA, UK
Department of Geology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK

Author for correspondence: m.williams{at}bgs.ac.uk

The Cautley Mudstone Formation and Cystoid Limestone Member of the Ashgill Formation (Windermere Supergroup; Ashgill Series), from the Cautley district of northern England, has yielded an ostracod fauna of more than 30 species. Many of these have short ranges, permitting recognition of stratigraphically successive Pusgillian–lower Cautleyan, middle–upper Cautleyan, and Rawtheyan ostracod faunas. Several species are also known from the upper Ordovician of North America (Anticosti Island), Scotland (Girvan district) and the Baltic region (Estonia, glacial erratic boulders of northern Germany), providing evidence to correlate upper Ordovician successions in these areas. The ostracods include abundant podocopes, at some horizons accounting for more than 80 % of the fauna. Binodicopes are also common, but palaeocopes are rare. Assemblages are typical of a clastic dominated open marine shelf setting. Diversity at most horizons is low (c. 3–5 species), but reaches a peak of between 13–14 species in middle Cautleyan horizons. Lower diversity at Pusgillian and Rawtheyan horizons coincides with the encroachment of deeper marine-shelf facies which were probably hostile to Ordovician benthonic ostracods. Some of the ostracods (particularly Aechmina) have distributions suggesting tolerance of a range of mid- to deep shelf benthonic palaeoenvironments, but none were pelagic. During Ashgill times the Cautley district (part of palaeocontinental Avalonia) was replete with ostracod genera and species which also occur in the Baltic region (palaeocontinental Baltica; more than 90 % generic similarity) and to a lesser, but nonetheless significant extent in North America and Scotland (parts of palaeocontinental Laurentia). Such trans-Tornquist Sea and Iapetus Ocean distributional patterns add to previous ostracod data that support models which show palaeogeographical proximity of Avalonia and Baltica, and Avalonia and Laurentia, by Ashgill times. The widely cited observation, that trans-Iapetus ostracod faunas remained strictly provincial until the mid-or late Silurian, cannot be sustained.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. SALAS ASSESSING THE BIODIVERSITY OF ORDOVICIAN OSTRACODS FROM THE ARGENTINE PRECORDILLERA Journal of Paleontology, November 1, 2007; 81(6): 1442 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. A. VANDENBROUCKE, B. RICKARDS, and J. VERNIERS Upper Ordovician chitinozoan biostratigraphy from the type Ashgill area (Cautley district) and the Pus Gill section (Dufton district, Cross Fell Inlier), Cumbria, Northern England Geological Magazine, November 1, 2005; 142(6): 783 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Vizan, H. VIZAN, J. N. CARNEY, P. TURNER, R. A. IXER, M. TOMASSO, R. P. MULLEN, and P. CLARKE Late Neoproterozoic to Early Palaeozoic palaeogeography of Avalonia: some palaeomagnetic constraints from Nuneaton, central England Geological Magazine, November 1, 2003; 140(6): 685 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]