Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Geological Magazine   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geological Magazine; January 2001; v. 138; no. 1; p. 31-38
© 2001 Cambridge University Press (CUP)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DODSON, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by KRAMERS, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

The Mushandike granite: further evidence for 3.4 Ga magmatism in the Zimbabwe craton

M. H. DODSON*,{dagger}, I. S. WILLIAMS* and J. D. KRAMERS{ddagger},{ddagger}

* Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia
{ddagger} Department of Geology, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box M.P.167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe

{dagger} Author for correspondence: mdodson{at}chevin.u-net.com; present address: School of Earth Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.

The conflict between independently published ages for the Mushandike Granite, Zimbabwe (2.92 ± 0.17 Ga and 3.45 ± 0.13 Ga) has been resolved in favour of the older age by SHRIMP U–Pb analyses of zircon. Two samples yield indistinguishable estimates of 3374 ± 7 and 3368 ± 11 Ma for the crystallization age of the magma. Together with published data from elsewhere in southern Zimbabwe, the results imply a widespread magmatic event at about 3.35 Ga. A single zircon core giving 3.46 Ga, together with the granite’s previously measured Nd model age, suggests that the Mushandike magma could have incorporated remobilized basement similar to the c. 3.5 Ga Tokwe gneisses which crop out 30 km to the west. The published Rb–Sr and Pb–Pb datasets show evidence of late Archaean disturbance of Sr and Pb isotope systematics. In the absence of exposed contacts between the Mushandike granite and the neighbouring Mushandike stromatolitic limestone, the new U–Pb emplacement age suggests that the limestone is unconformable on the granite.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Cambridge University Press (CUP)