Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Geological Magazine

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (44) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by ORMÖ, J. Articles by LINDSTRÖM, M. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

When a cosmic impact strikes the sea bed

JENS ORMÖ^*,* and MAURITS LINDSTRÖM

^* International Research School of Planetary Sciences, Universita’ d’Annunzio, Viale Pindaro 42, 65127 Pescara, Italy
Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Stockholm University, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden

^* Author for correspondence: ormo{at}sci.unich.it

Most bolides that collide with the Earth hit the sea. Limited knowledge about marine-target impacts hampers predictions about their perilousness. This study presents geological features that are particular to craters formed at sea. The features are most likely a result of the influence of the target on the cratering process. Marine-target craters form only if the target sea is shallow enough to admit sufficient kinetic energy into the sea bed. When the crater diameter is large compared to the water depth, the crater resembles its counterparts that are formed on land. Craters formed in deeper water are concentric, and often lack melt sheets and rim walls, but have deposits and radial gullies formed by the resurge of the sea. Impacts on the deep shelf are probably much more energetic than is suggested by the dimensions of the preserved crater.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. SCHMIEDER and E. BUCHNER Dating impact craters: palaeogeographic versus isotopic and stratigraphic methods - a brief case study Geological Magazine, July 1, 2008; 145(4): 586 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. King Jr., L. W. Petruny, and T. L. Neathery Ecosystem perturbation caused by a small Late Cretaceous marine impact, Gulf Coastal Plain, USA Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 424(0): 97 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Kalleson, H. Dypvik, and J. Naterstad Postimpact sediments in the Gardnos impact structure, Norway Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 437(0): 19 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Horton Jr., G. S. Gohn, D. S. Powars, and L. E. Edwards Origin and emplacement of impactites in the Chesapeake Bay impact structure, Virginia, USA Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 437(0): 73 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.A. Stewart and P.J. Allen 3D seismic reflection mapping of the Silverpit multi-ringed crater, North Sea Geological Society of America Bulletin, March 1, 2005; 117(3-4): 354 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. M. French, W. S. Cordua, and J.B. Plescia The Rock Elm meteorite impact structure, Wisconsin: Geology and shock-metamorphic effects in quartz Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2004; 116(1-2): 200 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Self-Trail Shock-wave-induced fracturing of calcareous nannofossils from the Chesapeake Bay impact crater Geology, August 1, 2003; 31(8): 697 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]